• Subscribe
  • Magazines
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
Saturday 31 May 2025
  • zh-hant 中文
  • ja 日本語
  • en English
IAG
Advertisement
  • Newsfeed
  • Mag Articles
  • Video
  • Opinion
  • Tags
  • Regional
    • Africa
    • Australia
    • Cambodia
    • China
    • CNMI
    • Europe
    • Hong Kong
    • India
    • Japan
    • Laos
    • Latin America
    • Malaysia
    • Macau
    • Nepal
    • New Zealand
    • North America
    • North Korea
    • Philippines
    • Russia
    • Singapore
    • South Korea
    • Sri Lanka
    • Thailand
    • UAE
    • Vietnam
  • Events
  • Contributors
  • SUBSCRIBE FREE
  • 中文
No Result
View All Result
IAG
  • Newsfeed
  • Mag Articles
  • Video
  • Opinion
  • Tags
  • Regional
    • Africa
    • Australia
    • Cambodia
    • China
    • CNMI
    • Europe
    • Hong Kong
    • India
    • Japan
    • Laos
    • Latin America
    • Malaysia
    • Macau
    • Nepal
    • New Zealand
    • North America
    • North Korea
    • Philippines
    • Russia
    • Singapore
    • South Korea
    • Sri Lanka
    • Thailand
    • UAE
    • Vietnam
  • Events
  • Contributors
  • SUBSCRIBE FREE
  • 中文
No Result
View All Result
IAG
No Result
View All Result

Macau Gaming Law series part 3: Problematic consequences of the satellite purge

Andrew W Scott by Andrew W Scott
Mon 7 Mar 2022 at 04:54
MGEMA calls for Macau’s satellite casinos to be licensed by law

Casino Kam Pek on the Macau peninsula is a satellite casino operated under the license of SJM.

66
SHARES
1.7k
VIEWS
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Welcome to the third in a series of articles on the Macau gaming law IAG is publishing throughout the month of March and in early April:

Part Date Article
1 Wed 2 Mar Here comes the extension … 26 June now seems impossible
2 Fri 4 Mar Cross-shareholding provisions crossing the line?
3 Mon 7 Mar Problematic consequences of the satellite purge
4 Wed 9 Mar Does the chip cap need a rethink?
5 Fri 11 Mar Reversion of gaming areas – a problem no one is talking about
6 Mon 14 Mar Directors’ liability – changing centuries of corporate law?
7 Mon 16 Mar Junkets, collaborators and concessionaire liability
8 Fri 25 Mar Minimum income – a stealthy gaming tax rate hike?
9 Mon 28 Mar National Security – a get out of jail free card for the government?
10 Fri 1 Apr Confusion reigns over so-called “Managing Director” shareholding
11 Sun 3 Apr 10-year concessions hamper investment in Macau
12 Wed 6 Apr Too broad suitability checks will dilute their effectiveness
13 Thu 7 Apr Provisions regarding other jurisdictions can cause legal conflict
14 Fri 8 Apr And that’s a wrap – where to from here?

One of the stranger features of the Macau casino gaming industry has been the existence of arrangements which have allowed certain entities to effectively participate, despite not being awarded a casino gaming concession.

A high-profile example of this has been the so-called “satellite casinos.” There is no definition or concept of a “satellite casino” under Macau law, but the term has become industry vernacular to describe certain contractual arrangements between a concessionaire and another party (sometimes referred to as a “Party B”) under which the Party B owns the real estate of a hotel-casino property and undertakes all non-gaming operations at the property. The concessionaire undertakes the gaming operations, with gaming staff (pit bosses, dealers, cage staff, etc) being employed by the concessionaire, and all other staff (F&B, hotel, etc) being employed by the Party B.

The concessionaire receives a share of “top line” (GGR) and/or “bottom line” (profit, however contractually defined), effectively as a fee for the “rental” of their casino concession, with the Party B receiving the remainder of gaming revenue in addition to all non-gaming revenue.

At best these arrangements might be considered efficient strategy by entrepreneurial businessmen looking to own a piece of the Macau gaming pie; at worst they could be seen as almost a charade to evade all the bother and expense associated with winning a casino gaming concession – while still taking part in the spoils of the industry.

Such satellite arrangements have been considered problematic by the Macau Gaming Inspection and Coordination Bureau (DICJ) and the wider government for years. While on a strictly technical basis gaming at satellite casinos is conducted by a concessionaire, those gaming operations are within the wider cocoon of a hotel-casino property owned by the Party B, with all non-gaming operations conducted by the Party B, so the on-site influence of Party B is profound. Indeed, over the years it has not been unusual for Party B owners to use language such as “our casino” or “our gaming operations.”

When the government released its Macau gaming law public consultation document, there was no mention of satellites, so most of the commentariat (yours truly excepted) assumed they had been consigned to the too-hard basket.

It was therefore a surprise to many when the draft new Macau gaming law was released, with a new provision under Article 5.3 stating, “A concessionaire must operate games of chance in casinos in a location where it holds ownership of the real estate … ” This new provision has been widely interpreted as a satellite-killer, although a three-year grace period will be introduced for existing satellite arrangements should the relevant concessionaire(s) be awarded a new concession in the upcoming tender process.

L’Arc, located on the Macau peninsula, is a satellite casino under SJM.

The language of Article 5.3, as it currently stands, makes no provision for partial ownership or ownership by a related entity in the concessionaire’s group of companies. If this is the final version passed by the Legislative Assembly, it therefore means all casino gaming real estate must be 100% owned by the Macau concessionaire entities, which are Macau-registered subsidiaries of the six operator listed entities.

There are 18 Macau casinos which have historically been considered satellites, operating under the concessions of SJM (14), Galaxy (3) and Melco (1), but these aren’t the only affected properties. Most Macau concessionaires own gaming real estate in multiple companies, with a new subsidiary company often created for new casino properties. Take Sands China for example. Sands Macao, The Venetian (together with the Plaza at Four Seasons and the Parisian) and The Londoner are owned by three different companies within the Sands China group of companies. Melco is also facing this situation at Studio City since it is not owned by Melco’s concessionaire entity.

Exacerbating this problem is the fact that these properties are extremely difficult to subdivide into strata titles, which is something the operators would want to do before considering a transfer of property – since it is only the real estate associated with gaming which needs to be owned by the concessionaire entity, not the entire resort. But Macau law has certain requirements for a property to have a separate strata title, such as separate entrances and exits, independent HVAC (heating, ventilation and air conditioning) systems, and more. This would be impossible for Macau’s integrated resorts – the word “integrated” is the clue! And any such transfers of real estate could trigger all manner of unintended consequences – one that immediately comes to mind is the financing of these properties.

Rio operates under Galaxy Entertainment Group’s license.

President of the Second Standing Committee of the Macau Legislative Assembly, Andrew Chan Chak Mo, seemed to acknowledge this difficulty late last week, suggesting to the media that the concessionaires may eventually hold a “property share” registration of some sort (the precise Chinese term used was “份額”). He gave the example of one floor operating as a casino in a building where that floor occupies say 10% of the building. Chan suggested the concessionaire could make a floorplan showing this 10% is the area of the casino, and merely register this area.

Chan’s suggested course of action probably raises more question than answers, not least of which would be how this concept could be integrated into the draft gaming law, if at all. Here’s another: if a provision in a new draft law is so problematic that it creates the need for a whole new concept of real estate ownership in Macau, why not consider altering the provision rather than creating the new concept! A simple solution would be to allow the real estate of the gaming area to be owned by any company within the group of companies the concessionaire was part of, and create a definition for a group, which would likely relate to shared control. Such definitions have been created many times before, so there is no need to reinvent the wheel here.

Another enormous difficulty would be finding agreement between Macau’s operators and the DICJ on how to precisely calculate the “property share” pertaining to gaming in an integrated resort. But that is a subject for a later article in this series!

The fourth article in this series will be published later this week.

Part Date Article
1 Wed 2 Mar Here comes the extension … 26 June now seems impossible
2 Fri 4 Mar Cross-shareholding provisions crossing the line?
3 Mon 7 Mar Problematic consequences of the satellite purge
4 Wed 9 Mar Does the chip cap need a rethink?
5 Fri 11 Mar Reversion of gaming areas – a problem no one is talking about
6 Mon 14 Mar Directors’ liability – changing centuries of corporate law?
7 Mon 16 Mar Junkets, collaborators and concessionaire liability
8 Fri 25 Mar Minimum income – a stealthy gaming tax rate hike?
9 Mon 28 Mar National Security – a get out of jail free card for the government?
10 Fri 1 Apr Confusion reigns over so-called “Managing Director” shareholding
11 Sun 3 Apr 10-year concessions hamper investment in Macau
12 Wed 6 Apr Too broad suitability checks will dilute their effectiveness
13 Thu 7 Apr Provisions regarding other jurisdictions can cause legal conflict
14 Fri 8 Apr And that’s a wrap – where to from here?

RelatedPosts

Robert Goldstein to step aside as LVS Chairman and CEO from March 2026, replaced by Patrick Dumont

Robert Goldstein: Macau gaming market challenged by increased competition, online gambling and US-Sino trade war

Fri 30 May 2025 at 06:42
Macau’s hotel occupancy rate reaches 89% in July

Macau’s hotel occupancy rate climbed to 87.8% in April

Thu 29 May 2025 at 17:27
On the brink

On the brink

Thu 29 May 2025 at 13:27
Macau GGR rises 43.7% year-on-year to MOP$86.86 billion in 2021

Moody’s maintains investment-grade rating for Macau as fiscal reserves climb to US$77 billion

Thu 29 May 2025 at 05:23
Load More
Tags: Chan Mak MoconcessionairesGaming LawLegislative AssemblyMacauMelco Resorts and EntertainmentSands Chinasatellite casinoStudio CityThe Londoner MacaoThe Venetian Macao
Share26Share5
Andrew W Scott

Andrew W Scott

Born in Australia, Andrew is a gaming industry expert and media publisher, commentator and journalist who moved to Hong Kong in 2005 and then Macau in 2009, when he founded O MEDIA, one of Macau’s largest media companies, former and parent company of Inside Asian Gaming (IAG). Both O MEDIA and IAG were merged with US-based gaming media brand CDC Gaming on 1 January 2025, under new corporate parent Complete Media Group (CMG).

Andrew was appointed CEO of Complete Media Group upon the merger. CMG is now the parent of three gaming media brands: Inside Asian Gaming (focusing on land-based gaming in the Asia-Pacific region), CDC Gaming (focusing on land-based gaming in the Americas), and Complete iGaming (focusing on online gaming in the Americas and APAC).

Andrew continues to be Vice Chairman and CEO of IAG and now-sister company O MEDIA.

Current Issue

Editorial – Foreigner-only casinos: Seize the day

Editorial – Foreigner-only casinos: Seize the day

by Ben Blaschke
Thu 29 May 2025 at 13:38

I was recently asked by someone working at a foreigner-only casino for my thoughts on the outlook for the Asian...

On the brink

On the brink

by Pierce Chan
Thu 29 May 2025 at 13:27

The transition period for Macau’s 11 satellite casinos is set to expire at the end of this year, after which...

A moral defense of gambling

A moral defense of gambling

by Andrew Russell
Wed 28 May 2025 at 18:19

Economist Andrew Russell explores the differences between community benefit and in-principle arguments for the existence of a legal gambling industry...

Face to face

Face to face

by Ben Blaschke
Wed 28 May 2025 at 18:08

Konami caught the eye at the recent G2E Asia show in Macau with its SYNK Vision Tables, which utilize facial...

Evolution Asia
Aristocrat
GLI
Mindslot
Mindslot
Solaire
Hann
Tecnet
Nustar
Jumbo

Related Posts

10 Years Ago – Reimagining Sri Lanka

Sri Lanka gazettes draft bill to establish Gambling Regulatory Authority

by Newsdesk
Sat 31 May 2025 at 06:03

A draft bill that would establish an official regulator for the Sri Lankan gaming industry, to be known as the Gambling Regulatory Authority, has taken another step forward after being gazetted. According to the Sri Lanka Mirror, the official announcement...

RGB International signs agreement to distribute KL Saberi and Atlas gaming machines

After record-breaking sales in 2024, Malaysia’s RGB sees 1Q25 profit fall to

by Newsdesk
Sat 31 May 2025 at 05:53

Malaysian gaming product distributor RGB International Bhd has reported group-wide revenue of MYR73.6 million (US$17.3 million) for the three months to 31 March 2025, down 65% year-on-year due to a lower number of products sold. The figure was also 79%...

Robert Goldstein to step aside as LVS Chairman and CEO from March 2026, replaced by Patrick Dumont

Robert Goldstein: Macau gaming market challenged by increased competition, online gambling and US-Sino trade war

by Ben Blaschke
Fri 30 May 2025 at 06:42

Las Vegas Sands (LVS) Chairman and CEO Robert Goldstein has bemoaned the lingering impact of the US-China trade war, as well as increased domestic and regional competition and the rise of online gambling across Asia for sustained flatness in the...

Industry hopes Thai Entertainment Complex Roundtable can establish “common ground” with those opposing legal casinos

Industry hopes Thai Entertainment Complex Roundtable can establish “common ground” with those opposing legal casinos

by Ben Blaschke
Fri 30 May 2025 at 05:38

Industry figures taking part in the Thai Entertainment Complex Roundtable (TECR) next Thursday 5 June hope to find common ground with those who oppose Thailand’s Entertainment Complex Bill, citing the opportunity to use an evidence-based approach to achieve outcomes that...



IAG

© 2005-2024
Inside Asian Gaming.
All rights reserved.

  • SUBSCRIBE FREE
  • NEWSFEED
  • MAG ARTICLES
  • VIDEO
  • OPINION
  • TAGS
  • REGIONAL
  • EVENTS
  • CONSULTING
  • CONTRIBUTORS
  • MAGAZINES
  • ABOUT
  • CONTACT
  • ADVERTISE
  • 中文

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • 中文
  • Subscribe
  • Newsfeed
  • Mag Articles
  • Video
  • Opinion
  • Tags
  • Regional
  • Events
  • Contributors
  • Magazines
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • About
  • Home for G2E Asia

© 2005-2024
Inside Asian Gaming.
All rights reserved.

  • 中文
  • English