• Subscribe
  • Magazines
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
Friday 30 May 2025
  • zh-hant 中文
  • ja 日本語
  • en English
IAG
Advertisement
  • Newsfeed
  • Mag Articles
  • Video
  • Opinion
  • Tags
  • Regional
    • Africa
    • Australia
    • Cambodia
    • China
    • CNMI
    • Europe
    • Hong Kong
    • India
    • Japan
    • Laos
    • Latin America
    • Malaysia
    • Macau
    • Nepal
    • New Zealand
    • North America
    • North Korea
    • Philippines
    • Russia
    • Singapore
    • South Korea
    • Sri Lanka
    • Thailand
    • UAE
    • Vietnam
  • Events
  • Contributors
  • SUBSCRIBE FREE
  • 中文
No Result
View All Result
IAG
  • Newsfeed
  • Mag Articles
  • Video
  • Opinion
  • Tags
  • Regional
    • Africa
    • Australia
    • Cambodia
    • China
    • CNMI
    • Europe
    • Hong Kong
    • India
    • Japan
    • Laos
    • Latin America
    • Malaysia
    • Macau
    • Nepal
    • New Zealand
    • North America
    • North Korea
    • Philippines
    • Russia
    • Singapore
    • South Korea
    • Sri Lanka
    • Thailand
    • UAE
    • Vietnam
  • Events
  • Contributors
  • SUBSCRIBE FREE
  • 中文
No Result
View All Result
IAG
No Result
View All Result

Re-imagining suitability? Well, not really

David Green by David Green
Tue 30 Apr 2024 at 15:19
Re-imagining suitability? Well, not really
32
SHARES
802
VIEWS
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

David Green queries to what extent regulators consider whether the associates of casino licensees have the necessary skills and experience to do the jobs they’ve been hired for.

Crown Melbourne

The multiple failures of governance and operational management attributed to Australia’s leading casino licensees, Crown Resorts and The Star Entertainment Group, by the various regulators and Royal Commission inquiries to which they have been subject over the past four years obscure an inconvenient truth; in assessing the suitability of the licensees’ associates, including directors and senior management, regulators have tended to apply a generic standard of suitability. This approach essentially focuses on the reputation, good character and financial soundness of an individual, and on identifying any links they may have with, for example, organized crime.

What this has arguably led to is a failure to adequately consider whether an associate has the requisite skills and experience to meet the requirements of the role to which they have been appointed by the licensee. The Casino Control Acts of the major Australian casino jurisdictions (Victoria, New South Wales and Queensland) all provide for a rather more nuanced standard, to the effect that suitability extends to the applicant being assessed as suitable to act in the capacity for which they are engaged. Put differently, no applicant should be found suitable unless they have the requisite skills and capacity to discharge their ascribed functions.

So, how might regulators determine whether someone is suitable to act in a defined capacity? A good starting point would be to compare the applicant’s skills, qualifications and experience with the articulated requirements for the position … what are the essential functions to be performed? What stakeholders will the position be required to interact with? What were the key recruitment/appointment criteria applied in engaging the applicant for the position? What inquiries did the licensee itself undertake to satisfy itself as to the suitability of the applicant to perform the assigned role?

Overlaid on an understanding of the organizational role and responsibilities of the applicant is the desirability of establishing that they are demonstrably capable of, and experienced in operating within, a highly regulated environment. That is not necessarily limited to gambling regulation; for example, the Chief Executive Officer and Chair of a listed casino licensee need to be familiar with both listing rules and corporate regulatory requirements, particularly around continuous disclosure and securities trading. That is not to say that they should be experts, but they should have sufficient knowledge and experience to enable them to effectively source and utilize expertise on a timely basis.

 

Ultimately, it is a matter for the judgement of the licensee who it considers fit for purpose in a role. That said, it remains solely for the regulator to be satisfied that an individual considered to be an associate of the licensee is suitable to fill the role. There is the potential for tension to arise between the two. For example, both Crown and Star have had periods in their recent history when the Chair of the Board has stepped into the role of acting Chief Executive. The requirements of the two roles are very different, particularly if the Chair is a Non-Executive Director. Aside from having to become an executive employee, with the capacity to perform the role full-time, there may also be a change in remuneration arrangements, and in the governance integrity of the licensee. Admittedly there may be little option for a regulator other than to allow such an interim arrangement, but it is in its own and the public’s interest that it satisfy itself that there is no better option available, and that any approval it may give for such an arrangement should it have concerns is strictly time limited.

A corollary of the foregoing is the composition of remuneration payable to an applicant, particularly the “at-risk” component of it. In the quest to drive superior returns and commensurately reward and retain management, most listed companies have adopted remuneration strategies which favor short- and long-term incentives over base salary and allowances. Many of the metrics used to determine the quantum of such rewards are generic in nature, such as average share price, total shareholder return, market share growth and so on. The underlying principle, what gets measured gets done, may influence shareholder support, but there is a question as to whether companies operating licensed casinos should simply run with the pack when it comes to such metrics. They may argue that they need to be competitive for talent, but the flip side of reward is risk. Given the demonstrated failure of both Crown and Star prior to 2022 to rein in risk and manage their respective regulatory compliance obligations, what could regulators have done to influence their remuneration policies?

Controlled contracts in Victoria and New South Wales are contracts which must be filed with the regulator, and which may be subject to a direction to the licensee by the regulator not to proceed with, or to disengage from the contract. The regulators have some discretion as to what they consider to be controlled contracts, which generally revolve around their materiality and their subject. Since employment contracts with CEOs may provide for millions of dollars in remuneration to be paid annually, and contain trigger provisions which might or should raise concerns for regulators, there is a strong case to be made for including C-Suite contracts under the umbrella of controlled contracts.

So, what metrics might be appropriate to a casino licensee’s CEO? Since the regulators’ objectives must include compliance with their requirements, zero events of material (ie. requiring an outlay exceeding a threshold amount by the company) non-compliance would be a sensible starting point. Vesting periods on share or option entitlements could also be deferred for a period after an executive has left the employ of the licensee. Extended claw-back periods could be applied to cash bonuses to ensure that they could be reclaimed by the licensee should it subsequently emerge that the recipient should not have been entitled to a bonus, for example due to withholding information which may, if known, have impacted quantitative metrics, such as share price, or regulatory compliance.

The point is moot as to whether greater advertence to the nuances of suitability would have mitigated the non-compliant behaviors exhibited by Crown and Star in the periods covered by their respective inquiries and commissions. Nevertheless, the tools are available and the public interest mandates that they be used more extensively.

Tags: AustraliaCurrent Issueregulatorssuitability
Share13Share2
David Green

David Green

The founder of Newpage Consulting, David Green has advised on casino regulation in a number of geographies including New Zealand, Singapore, Macau, Cambodia and Japan. He served as Presiding Member of the Independent Gambling Authority in South Australia prior to relocating to Macau in 2001.

Current Issue

Editorial – Foreigner-only casinos: Seize the day

Editorial – Foreigner-only casinos: Seize the day

by Ben Blaschke
Thu 29 May 2025 at 13:38

I was recently asked by someone working at a foreigner-only casino for my thoughts on the outlook for the Asian...

On the brink

On the brink

by Pierce Chan
Thu 29 May 2025 at 13:27

The transition period for Macau’s 11 satellite casinos is set to expire at the end of this year, after which...

A moral defense of gambling

A moral defense of gambling

by Andrew Russell
Wed 28 May 2025 at 18:19

Economist Andrew Russell explores the differences between community benefit and in-principle arguments for the existence of a legal gambling industry...

Face to face

Face to face

by Ben Blaschke
Wed 28 May 2025 at 18:08

Konami caught the eye at the recent G2E Asia show in Macau with its SYNK Vision Tables, which utilize facial...

Evolution Asia
Aristocrat
GLI
Mindslot
Mindslot
Solaire
Hann
Tecnet
Nustar
Jumbo

Related Posts

Editorial – Foreigner-only casinos: Seize the day

Editorial – Foreigner-only casinos: Seize the day

by Ben Blaschke
Thu 29 May 2025 at 13:38

I was recently asked by someone working at a foreigner-only casino for my thoughts on the outlook for the Asian gaming industry. That’s quite a wide-reaching question with dozens of moving parts, but it got me thinking specifically about how...

A moral defense of gambling

A moral defense of gambling

by Andrew Russell
Wed 28 May 2025 at 18:19

Economist Andrew Russell explores the differences between community benefit and in-principle arguments for the existence of a legal gambling industry and why the latter is vital in winning over sentiment. When I was corresponding with this publication’s Managing Editor Ben...

Editorial – Knife’s edge

Editorial – Knife’s edge

by Andrew W Scott and Ben Blaschke
Tue 29 Apr 2025 at 15:14

Thailand’s Entertainment Complex journey is at a critical point, with the success or failure of the initiative to be determined by decisions made over the coming months. The common narrative now appears to be that legislation governing development of the...

A Baccarat perspective – Part 2

A Baccarat perspective – Part 2

by Ryan Hong-Wai Ho
Tue 29 Apr 2025 at 13:03

The first part of this series, published in the April issue of IAG, discussed the rise of baccarat in Macau’s gaming industry. Building on that discussion, Ryan Ho continues to examine the latest betting options shaping this iconic casino game....



IAG

© 2005-2024
Inside Asian Gaming.
All rights reserved.

  • SUBSCRIBE FREE
  • NEWSFEED
  • MAG ARTICLES
  • VIDEO
  • OPINION
  • TAGS
  • REGIONAL
  • EVENTS
  • CONSULTING
  • CONTRIBUTORS
  • MAGAZINES
  • ABOUT
  • CONTACT
  • ADVERTISE
  • 中文

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • 中文
  • Subscribe
  • Newsfeed
  • Mag Articles
  • Video
  • Opinion
  • Tags
  • Regional
  • Events
  • Contributors
  • Magazines
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • About
  • Home for G2E Asia

© 2005-2024
Inside Asian Gaming.
All rights reserved.

  • 中文
  • English