• Subscribe
  • Magazines
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
Tuesday 5 August 2025
  • zh-hant 中文
  • ja 日本語
  • en English
IAG
Advertisement
  • Newsfeed
  • Mag Articles
  • Video
  • Opinion
  • Tags
  • Regional
    • Africa
    • Australia
    • Cambodia
    • China
    • CNMI
    • Europe
    • Hong Kong
    • India
    • Japan
    • Laos
    • Latin America
    • Malaysia
    • Macau
    • Nepal
    • New Zealand
    • North America
    • North Korea
    • Philippines
    • Russia
    • Singapore
    • South Korea
    • Sri Lanka
    • Thailand
    • UAE
    • Vietnam
  • Events
  • Contributors
  • SUBSCRIBE FREE
  • 中文
No Result
View All Result
IAG
  • Newsfeed
  • Mag Articles
  • Video
  • Opinion
  • Tags
  • Regional
    • Africa
    • Australia
    • Cambodia
    • China
    • CNMI
    • Europe
    • Hong Kong
    • India
    • Japan
    • Laos
    • Latin America
    • Malaysia
    • Macau
    • Nepal
    • New Zealand
    • North America
    • North Korea
    • Philippines
    • Russia
    • Singapore
    • South Korea
    • Sri Lanka
    • Thailand
    • UAE
    • Vietnam
  • Events
  • Contributors
  • SUBSCRIBE FREE
  • 中文
No Result
View All Result
IAG
No Result
View All Result

Macau Gaming Law series part 2: Cross-shareholding provisions crossing the line?

Andrew W Scott by Andrew W Scott
Fri 4 Mar 2022 at 06:37
Macau GGR rises 43.7% year-on-year to MOP$86.86 billion in 2021
49
SHARES
1.2k
VIEWS
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Welcome to the second in a series of articles on the Macau gaming law IAG is publishing throughout the month of March and in early April:

Part Date Article
1 Wed 2 Mar Here comes the extension … 26 June now seems impossible
2 Fri 4 Mar Cross-shareholding provisions crossing the line?
3 Mon 7 Mar Problematic consequences of the satellite purge
4 Wed 9 Mar Does the chip cap need a rethink?
5 Fri 11 Mar Reversion of gaming areas – a problem no one is talking about
6 Mon 14 Mar Directors’ liability – changing centuries of corporate law?
7 Mon 16 Mar Junkets, collaborators and concessionaire liability
8 Fri 25 Mar Minimum income – a stealthy gaming tax rate hike?
9 Mon 28 Mar National Security – a get out of jail free card for the government?
10 Fri 1 Apr Confusion reigns over so-called “Managing Director” shareholding
11 Sun 3 Apr 10-year concessions hamper investment in Macau
12 Wed 6 Apr Too broad suitability checks will dilute their effectiveness
13 Thu 7 Apr Provisions regarding other jurisdictions can cause legal conflict
14 Fri 8 Apr And that’s a wrap – where to from here?

Article 17(11) of the new draft Macau gaming law reads, “Neither concessionaires nor shareholders who hold 5% or more of their capital stock may directly or indirectly own any capital stock of other concessionaires operating games of chance in casinos in the Macau Special Administrative Region.”

There appear to be no grandfathering provisions, so any shareholder who currently owns shares in more than one Macau concessionaire – typically referred to as cross-shareholding – will presumably be required to divest their interests in all but one Macau concessionaire, if their shareholding in at least one of those concessionaires is 5% or more, and the shareholder wishes to retain a shareholding above that 5% threshold.

Two cross-shareholding situations which may be affected by this provision immediately come to mind.

First, Pansy Ho, Co-Chairperson and Managing Director of MGM China, holds substantial equity in both MGM China and SJM Resorts. Indeed, her sister Daisy Ho is no less than Chairman of SJM.

Second, Galaxy Entertainment Group, whose Vice Chairman and CEO Francis Lui was listed as the most powerful person in the Asian gaming industry in the 2021 Asian Gaming Power 50 list, owns 4.9% of Las Vegas-based Wynn Resorts, which in turn owns approximately 72% of Wynn Macau.

Will Pansy Ho have to divest her interest in one of MGM China or SJM? Or could a merger even be on the cards? What about Galaxy and Wynn? The same questions apply.

Then there is the issue of international cross-shareholding. Article 22C(1) of the proposed new Macau law reads, “If a concessionaire intends to operate games of chance in casinos or other types of games in other jurisdictions, it shall first obtain an authorization from the Chief Executive …”

Other provisions in Article 22C create certain restrictions for capital transfers under particular international cross-shareholding circumstances and require concessionaires to inform the Gaming Inspection and Coordination Bureau (DICJ) should any 5% or more shareholders operate casinos in other jurisdictions.

The obvious example here is Las Vegas Sands, which is both the parent company of Sands China – a Macau concessionaire – and the operator of Singapore integrated resort Marina Bay Sands.

Presumably such provisions limiting domestic and international cross-shareholding are designed to promote competition between casino operators – whether within Macau or internationally.

But is the Macau government going too far in restricting cross-shareholding?

Firstly, 5% seems like a very low threshold. Owning a mere 5% of a company hardly provides control over the management of that company. In other industries in other jurisdictions, it is not unusual to see cross-shareholding provisions apply at a 10% threshold. And to be honest, even owning 10% of a company hardly offers unfettered control – just ask Henry Cheng.

Secondly, limiting 5% or more shareholders to only owning shares in one Macau concessionaire seems a bit draconian. The way the law currently reads, such a shareholder is prohibited from owning even one single share in another concessionaire. Why not limit the ownership in a second concessionaire to, say, 5%? Or even 10%?

Thirdly, is there a need to limit international cross-shareholdings? If the policy intention here is to promote international competition, that could work against the interests of Macau just as much – or even more – than it works to Macau’s advantage. Perhaps the Macau government wants Macau concessionaires and their major shareholders to focus just on their Macau interests and not spread their efforts over multiple jurisdictions. But Macau concessionaires having gaming assets in other jurisdictions could be to Macau’s benefit. Player lists can be shared, economies of scale created, and best practices imported.

And finally, there is a very practical argument against excessive cross-shareholding restrictions – and that is the very limited number of top-tier IR operators that exist in the world. Any brutally honest assessment of the global IR industry must conclude that the number of such top-level operators can be counted on two hands, and arguably perhaps just one hand! With so few top-notch IR companies around the world and many jurisdictions opening or expanding their IR industries, a certain amount of cross-shareholding is inevitable – arguably even desirable.

The third article in this series will be published next week.

Part Date Article
1 Wed 2 Mar Here comes the extension … 26 June now seems impossible
2 Fri 4 Mar Cross-shareholding provisions crossing the line?
3 Mon 7 Mar Problematic consequences of the satellite purge
4 Wed 9 Mar Does the chip cap need a rethink?
5 Fri 11 Mar Reversion of gaming areas – a problem no one is talking about
6 Mon 14 Mar Directors’ liability – changing centuries of corporate law?
7 Mon 16 Mar Junkets, collaborators and concessionaire liability
8 Fri 25 Mar Minimum income – a stealthy gaming tax rate hike?
9 Mon 28 Mar National Security – a get out of jail free card for the government?
10 Fri 1 Apr Confusion reigns over so-called “Managing Director” shareholding
11 Sun 3 Apr 10-year concessions hamper investment in Macau
12 Wed 6 Apr Too broad suitability checks will dilute their effectiveness
13 Thu 7 Apr Provisions regarding other jurisdictions can cause legal conflict
14 Fri 8 Apr And that’s a wrap – where to from here?

RelatedPosts

Legal battle continues to hurt Donaco’s bottom line

Donaco shareholders approve US$35 million privatization bid

Mon 4 Aug 2025 at 15:36
Experts claim 90% of Macau money exchange gangs eradicated since passing of illegal gaming law

Morgan Stanley says Macau now a growth market, raising 2025 GGR and EBITDA forecasts after two consecutive monthly beats

Mon 4 Aug 2025 at 11:48
Macau GGR up 19% year-on-year to MOP$22.1 billion in July, sets new post-pandemic record

Macau GGR up 19% year-on-year to MOP$22.1 billion in July, sets new post-pandemic record

Fri 1 Aug 2025 at 12:49
Melco’s long-stalled Countdown Hotel at City of Dreams to be converted into 150-key all-suite hotel

Melco’s long-stalled Countdown Hotel at City of Dreams to be converted into 150-key all-suite hotel

Fri 1 Aug 2025 at 06:45
Load More
Tags: casinosconcessionairescross-shareholdingFrancis LuiGaming LawMacauPansy Ho
Share20Share3
Andrew W Scott

Andrew W Scott

Born in Australia, Andrew is a gaming industry expert and media publisher, commentator and journalist who moved to Hong Kong in 2005 and then Macau in 2009, when he founded O MEDIA, one of Macau’s largest media companies, former and parent company of Inside Asian Gaming (IAG). Both O MEDIA and IAG were merged with US-based gaming media brand CDC Gaming on 1 January 2025, under new corporate parent Complete Media Group (CMG).

Andrew was appointed CEO of Complete Media Group upon the merger. CMG is now the parent of three gaming media brands: Inside Asian Gaming (focusing on land-based gaming in the Asia-Pacific region), CDC Gaming (focusing on land-based gaming in the Americas), and Complete iGaming (focusing on online gaming in the Americas and APAC).

Andrew continues to be Vice Chairman and CEO of IAG and now-sister company O MEDIA.

Current Issue

Editorial – Better late than never

Editorial – Better late than never

by Ben Blaschke
Thu 31 Jul 2025 at 07:13

Inside Asian Gaming has in recent weeks been hearing increasing chatter around a possible move by Vietnamese authorities to introduce...

Angel’s Yasushi Shigeta

Angel’s Yasushi Shigeta

by Ben Blaschke
Thu 31 Jul 2025 at 07:08

Yasushi Shigeta, Chairman and owner of one of the world’s largest gaming industry suppliers, Angel Group, sits down with Inside...

The Magic Number

The Magic Number

by David Bonnet
Thu 31 Jul 2025 at 06:41

In this in-depth deep dive into the evolution of the Asian gaming landscape, David Bonnet argues that many regional jurisdictions...

Rashid Suliman – A road well traveled

Rashid Suliman – A road well traveled

by Ben Blaschke
Thu 31 Jul 2025 at 02:45

Rashid Suliman, Vice President of Global Gaming Asia-Pacific for casino solutions provider TransAct Technologies, provides some insight into his unique...

Evolution Asia
Your browser does not support HTML5 video.
Aristocrat
GLI
Nustar
SABA
Mindslot
Solaire
Hann
Tecnet
HKUST
NWR

Related Posts

First auction of Imperial Pacific gaming equipment postponed

IPI’s abandoned Saipan hotel and casino building shows signs of wear and tear but no immediate danger ahead of planned sale

by Newsdesk
Tue 5 Aug 2025 at 05:34

The Department of Public Works of the CNMI has found that Imperial Pacific International’s unfinished hotel and casino building in Garapan, Saipan, is showing signs of wear and tear some five years after construction was halted but does not pose...

Casino revenue at Korea’s Paradise Co up 23% year-on-year to US$55 million in July, slightly down sequentially

Casino revenue at Korea’s Paradise Co up 23% year-on-year to US$55 million in July, slightly down sequentially

by Newsdesk
Tue 5 Aug 2025 at 05:14

Leading Korean foreigner-only casino operator Paradise Co reported a 23.0% year-on-year increase in casino revenues to KRW75.7 billion (US$54.7 million) in July, however the figure was 6.3% lower than in June. According to information filed with the Korea Exchange. July...

Legal battle continues to hurt Donaco’s bottom line

Donaco shareholders approve US$35 million privatization bid

by Ben Blaschke
Mon 4 Aug 2025 at 15:36

A proposal by Hong Kong’s Argyle Street Management Limited to acquire 100% of the shares in ASX-listed, Southeast Asian casino operator Donaco International Ltd that it doesn’t already own is one step away from becoming reality after Donaco shareholders on...

Light & Wonder’s Siobhan Lane

Global debut of “Fortune Doors” among five Light & Wonder game families to be showcased at next week’s Australasian Gaming Expo

by Ben Blaschke
Mon 4 Aug 2025 at 13:16

Global gaming giant Light & Wonder will debut its latest game family, Fortune Doors, at next week’s Australasian Gaming Expo in Sydney – one of five game families offering 14 unique themes between them to feature at the company’s stand....

Your browser does not support the video tag.


IAG

© 2005-2025
Inside Asian Gaming.
All rights reserved.

  • SUBSCRIBE FREE
  • NEWSFEED
  • MAG ARTICLES
  • VIDEO
  • OPINION
  • TAGS
  • REGIONAL
  • EVENTS
  • CONSULTING
  • CONTRIBUTORS
  • MAGAZINES
  • ABOUT
  • CONTACT
  • ADVERTISE
  • 中文

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • 中文
  • Subscribe
  • Newsfeed
  • Mag Articles
  • Video
  • Opinion
  • Tags
  • Regional
  • Events
  • Contributors
  • Magazines
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • About
  • Home for G2E Asia

© 2005-2025
Inside Asian Gaming.
All rights reserved.

  • 中文
  • English