• Subscribe
  • Magazines
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
Saturday 2 August 2025
  • zh-hant 中文
  • ja 日本語
  • en English
IAG
Advertisement
  • Newsfeed
  • Mag Articles
  • Video
  • Opinion
  • Tags
  • Regional
    • Africa
    • Australia
    • Cambodia
    • China
    • CNMI
    • Europe
    • Hong Kong
    • India
    • Japan
    • Laos
    • Latin America
    • Malaysia
    • Macau
    • Nepal
    • New Zealand
    • North America
    • North Korea
    • Philippines
    • Russia
    • Singapore
    • South Korea
    • Sri Lanka
    • Thailand
    • UAE
    • Vietnam
  • Events
  • Contributors
  • SUBSCRIBE FREE
  • 中文
  • 日本語
No Result
View All Result
IAG
  • Newsfeed
  • Mag Articles
  • Video
  • Opinion
  • Tags
  • Regional
    • Africa
    • Australia
    • Cambodia
    • China
    • CNMI
    • Europe
    • Hong Kong
    • India
    • Japan
    • Laos
    • Latin America
    • Malaysia
    • Macau
    • Nepal
    • New Zealand
    • North America
    • North Korea
    • Philippines
    • Russia
    • Singapore
    • South Korea
    • Sri Lanka
    • Thailand
    • UAE
    • Vietnam
  • Events
  • Contributors
  • SUBSCRIBE FREE
  • 中文
  • 日本語
No Result
View All Result
IAG
No Result
View All Result

A Question of “Public Interest”

David Green by David Green
Thu 6 May 2021 at 13:01
A Question of “Public Interest”
39
SHARES
964
VIEWS
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Exactly what is in the “public interest” when it comes to determining whether Crown Melbourne should retain its casino license in Victoria?

On 22 February 2021, the appointment and terms of reference of the Finkelstein Royal Commission into Crown Melbourne were gazetted in Victoria. This followed on from the Bergin inquiry conducted in New South Wales, which had reported some three weeks earlier, among other things, that Crown Sydney was not a suitable person to give effect to the Barangaroo restricted gaming license, and that its parent, Crown Resorts, was not a suitable person to be a close associate of the company holding that gaming license. Much of the conduct identified by Bergin as inimical to suitability related to the Melbourne casino, operated by another subsidiary of Crown Resorts, Crown Melbourne.

A key distinction between the two inquiries lies in the fact that Patricia Bergin was appointed by the New South Wales gaming regulator, the Independent Liquor and Gambling Authority, whereas Ray Finkelstein has been appointed by the Victorian Governor-in-Council. Commissioner Finkelstein will report to the Parliament of Victoria, which is responsible for the articulation of public policy and the development and passing of the legislative framework which gives effect to it. The Victorian casino regulator, the Victorian Commission for Gambling and Liquor Regulation, has effectively been sidelined. Indeed, Commissioner Finkelstein is required to consider whether changes should be made to the legislative framework administered by the VCGLR as a consequence of the Commission’s findings or recommendations.

Since much of the heavy lifting associated with identifying, investigating and characterizing matters going to the suitability of Crown’s respective licensed entities in Sydney, Melbourne and Perth, and the parent company itself, has been done by Bergin, it may be expected that Finkelstein will devote considerable time to addressing Term of Reference D: “Whether it is in the public interest for Crown Melbourne to continue to hold the casino license in Victoria.” This is the point at which the difference between a Royal Commission and an inquiry commissioned by a casino regulator becomes material.

Victoria’s Casino Control Act requires the VCGLR to conduct periodic reviews of, among other things, Crown Melbourne’s suitability to hold the casino license and whether or not it is in the public interest that the casino license should continue in force. The Act defines public interest as something to be determined by the regulator having regard to “the creation and maintenance of public confidence and trust in the credibility, integrity and stability of casino operations [emphasis added].”

Ray Finkelstein QC is heading up Victoria’s Royal Commission into Crown Resorts.

This definition does not apply to restrict the breadth of Finkelstein’s assessment of whether the public interest is served by allowing Crown Melbourne to continue to hold the Victorian casino license. His powers do not derive from VCGLR, or the Casino Control Act; they are drawn from the Inquiries Act of 2014, which gives the Commissioner greatly enhanced powers and jurisdiction to pursue the Terms of Reference.

An example demonstrates the point. Casino operations, as the VCGLR’s yardstick for determining whether the public interest is served by the licensee, are essentially the internal processes and systems deployed in the conduct of permitted gaming activities. Not included are matters such as the quality and independence of governance of the entity holding the license, its compliance with legislation other than that regulating the casino license and the conduct of gaming (such as anti-money laundering laws), and the contribution that the casino may make to the welfare and economic development of Victoria.

Although those matters are not criteria relevant to the statutory license reviews conducted by VCGLR, they are clearly within the purview of factors to which a Royal Commissioner may advert when seeking to establish whether the public interest is served by allowing Crown Melbourne to continue to hold and exploit its casino license.

The complexity which the public interest test raises for the Finkelstein Commission lies in the criteria it applies to guide its determination, and the relative weight which it attaches to each criterion. It will need to establish just who is comprised within the scope of “the public”. Does the term include anti-gambling advocates, whose opposition is more to casinos themselves rather than to Crown Melbourne as a licensee? Should such a normative view be accorded greater weight than say an empirical view of the performance of the licensee in complying with the terms of its license?

It is this tension which perhaps underlies Crown’s reluctance to concede that money laundering actually took place at Crown Melbourne. If it did concede the point, the normative would align with the empirical, which would provide much greater gravitas to those arguing that the Crown Melbourne license should be revoked on public interest grounds.

Normative arguments such as those advanced by the concern sector (generally an amalgam of religious and welfare groups) are often met with the response that Crown Melbourne is the largest single-site employer in Victoria, that the Crown Southbank complex is one of the most visited destinations in Melbourne and that the casino is one of the state’s leading taxpayers. While all of that may be true, are those metrics uniquely a product of Crown’s investment and operational expertise, or are they an outcome which might be expected of any skilled casino operator having conducted a state-sponsored monopoly business for more than 25 years in what will soon be Australia’s largest city? To what extent has Crown’s alleged non-compliance with laws against money laundering and doing business with organized crime groups contributed to the return it has generated for the state, however that may be assessed?

Public interest tests have been in use in areas such as privacy and national security legislation and in liquor licensing for many years in Australia. Yet there remains remarkably little guidance, either legislative or judicial, regarding the content of such tests. Either by design or default they have become rather subjective, and no real effort has been made to define the term, or a methodological approach to determining it.

If Finkelstein contributes nothing further to what has already been established by Bergin, it should add to the analytic jurisprudence which supports our understanding of what a public interest test requires where a casino license is involved.

RelatedPosts

Star to open AU$3.6 billion Queen’s Wharf Brisbane development on 29 August

Star’s Hong Kong partners officially terminate Queen’s Wharf Brisbane acquisition deal

Fri 1 Aug 2025 at 13:02
Editorial – Better late than never

Editorial – Better late than never

Thu 31 Jul 2025 at 07:13
Angel’s Yasushi Shigeta

Angel’s Yasushi Shigeta

Thu 31 Jul 2025 at 07:08
The Magic Number

The Magic Number

Thu 31 Jul 2025 at 06:41
Load More
Tags: 2021AustraliaBergin ReportCrown MelbourneCrown ResortsCrown SydneyCurrent IssueMayMelbourneNew South WalesPatricia BerginRaymond FinkelsteinSydneyVictoria Australian State
Share16Share3
David Green

David Green

The founder of Newpage Consulting, David Green has advised on casino regulation in a number of geographies including New Zealand, Singapore, Macau, Cambodia and Japan. He served as Presiding Member of the Independent Gambling Authority in South Australia prior to relocating to Macau in 2001.

Current Issue

Editorial – Better late than never

Editorial – Better late than never

by Ben Blaschke
Thu 31 Jul 2025 at 07:13

Inside Asian Gaming has in recent weeks been hearing increasing chatter around a possible move by Vietnamese authorities to introduce...

Angel’s Yasushi Shigeta

Angel’s Yasushi Shigeta

by Ben Blaschke
Thu 31 Jul 2025 at 07:08

Yasushi Shigeta, Chairman and owner of one of the world’s largest gaming industry suppliers, Angel Group, sits down with Inside...

The Magic Number

The Magic Number

by David Bonnet
Thu 31 Jul 2025 at 06:41

In this in-depth deep dive into the evolution of the Asian gaming landscape, David Bonnet argues that many regional jurisdictions...

Rashid Suliman – A road well traveled

Rashid Suliman – A road well traveled

by Ben Blaschke
Thu 31 Jul 2025 at 02:45

Rashid Suliman, Vice President of Global Gaming Asia-Pacific for casino solutions provider TransAct Technologies, provides some insight into his unique...

Evolution Asia
Your browser does not support HTML5 video.
Aristocrat
GLI
Nustar
SABA
Mindslot
Solaire
Hann
Tecnet
HKUST
NWR

Related Posts

Editorial – Better late than never

Editorial – Better late than never

by Ben Blaschke
Thu 31 Jul 2025 at 07:13

Inside Asian Gaming has in recent weeks been hearing increasing chatter around a possible move by Vietnamese authorities to introduce enhanced locals gaming to the market. Although such rumors have made the rounds before, inquires have confirmed that the chatter...

The Magic Number

The Magic Number

by David Bonnet
Thu 31 Jul 2025 at 06:41

In this in-depth deep dive into the evolution of the Asian gaming landscape, David Bonnet argues that many regional jurisdictions have been sucked into believing they can replicate the Macau or Singapore IR model – without access to those cities'...

Singapore’s Casino Legalization Experience: Setting the Standards for Minimizing and Managing Social Costs

ประสบการณ์การทำให้คาสิโนถูกกฎหมายของประเทศสิงคโปร์: การกำหนดมาตรฐานเพื่อลดผลกระทบทางสังคมให้น้อยที่สุด ขณะเพิ่มประโยชน์ทางเศรษฐกิจให้มากที่สุด

by Lau Kok Keng
Thu 10 Jul 2025 at 18:19

บทความนี้จะพิจารณากระบวนการที่ประเทศสิงคโปร์ดำเนินการเมื่อรัฐบาลประกาศในปี พ.ศ. 2547 พิจารณาให้การเปิดคาสิโนเป็นเรื่องถูกกฎหมาย รวมถึงทัศนคติของสาธารณชนต่อประเด็นดังกล่าว และวิธีที่รัฐบาลใช้ในการอธิบายแนวทางการจัดการความเสี่ยงจากปัญหาการพนัน บทความยังกล่าวถึงมาตรการป้องกันที่รัฐบาลได้นำมาใช้เพื่อลดผลกระทบทางสังคมและแก้ไขปัญหาการพนันตลอดจนกา

Singapore’s Casino Legalization Experience: Setting the Standards for Minimizing and Managing Social Costs

Singapore’s Casino Legalization Experience: Setting the Standards for Minimizing and Managing Social Costs

by Lau Kok Keng
Thu 10 Jul 2025 at 18:03

This article will examine the process Singapore went through when the government announced in 2004 that it was contemplating legalizing casinos, and the public sentiment to this and how the government sought to explain its intended management of the dangers...

Your browser does not support the video tag.


IAG

© 2005-2025
Inside Asian Gaming.
All rights reserved.

  • SUBSCRIBE FREE
  • NEWSFEED
  • MAG ARTICLES
  • VIDEO
  • OPINION
  • TAGS
  • REGIONAL
  • EVENTS
  • CONSULTING
  • CONTRIBUTORS
  • MAGAZINES
  • ABOUT
  • CONTACT
  • ADVERTISE
  • 中文
  • 日本語

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • 中文
  • 日本語
  • Subscribe
  • Newsfeed
  • Mag Articles
  • Video
  • Opinion
  • Tags
  • Regional
  • Events
  • Contributors
  • Magazines
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • About
  • Home for G2E Asia

© 2005-2025
Inside Asian Gaming.
All rights reserved.

  • 中文
  • English
  • 日本語